↑ Macintosh products, ComputerWorld p.38.↑ Monotone Electronics Prepress Systems (MEPS), Dunn Report: Electronic Publishing & Prepress Systems vol.8, p.226.↑ Adobe Systems Inc., Editor & Publisher vol.122, p.28.
#Adobe font folio 11 alternatives for mac#
↑ Adobe Type Folio for Mac Announced at Seybold Conference, InfoWorld, p.6.Version 9.0 of the CD-ROM was released in January 2001 with a peak of over 2,750 fonts, mostly Type 1 and introducing some OpenType versions for $8,999.
Version 8.0 of the CD-ROM was released in September 1997 with over 2,300 Type 1 fonts.Version 7.1 of the CD-ROM was released in 1996 with over 2,100 Type 1 fonts.Version 7.0 of the CD-ROM was released on Mawith over 2,000 Type 1 fonts.Version 6.0 of the CD-ROM was released in March 1994 with 360 Adobe Type Library packages, containing over 1,800 to 1,900 Type 1 fonts.By 1994, the Font Folio CD-ROM contained about 1,800 Type 1 fonts.In 1992, Font Folio shipped with 250 Adobe Type Library packages on a 105MB external hard disk for $14,000 that could be attached to a computer or PostScript printer with a SCSI port.In 1990, Font Folio shipped with 650 fonts on a CD-ROM (bundled with an external NEC CD-ROM drive) for $15,900 or a 80MB external hard disk for $16,900 that could be attached to a PostScript printer with a SCSI port.It was available from November 1988 with over 300 PostScript Type 1 fonts produced by Adobe on a 45MB external hard disk for US$9,600 that could be attached to a computer or a PostScript printer with a SCSI port, such as the LaserWriter II NTX. The folio was first announced under the name of Adobe Type Folio at the Seybold Desktop Publishing Conference in September 1988.And simply don't like Cambria's small caps. For example, Cambria and Cambria Math, they bare the same name but they do have different designs. I am not saying that similarity is something bad. The problem is that scaling changes weight, and weights is one of the criterion for matching fonts. If similarity is a criterion, then scaled Arrus has exactly the same shape as non-scaled Arrus. If one set Arrus in body, and need some large size text for headings, then Cataneo will be a far more better choice than just scale up Arrus. This is neither a sufficient nor a necessary condition for the text and math to blend well. In addition, I don't think the text fonts have to be similar to Cambria Math in design. I would prefer a fonts with at least the following features, smcp, case, cpsp, lnum, onum, tnum, pnum, and of course kern, liga
#Adobe font folio 11 alternatives free#
I have both commercial and free fonts for choice (more specific those in Adobe Font folio 11 and some others).
Though I fell Cambria math is acceptable to me, I don't like its text font.Īny suggestions are more than welcome. So I have to decide which text font to use with Cambria math. And the design of ASANA math, in my opinion still requires some improvement, especially the weights do not blend very well. And the design of STIX is just too "Times Roman" and I simply don't like Times all the time. Though I like euler, I don't think my supervisor will like to see it in my thesis. And after some trying I have decided to stick with Cambria math for now. However, as a Statistics PhD student, Math font is surely the first thing I have to decide. Recently I decided to move my personal style (a class file) to be unicode-math and fontspec based, so I can freely use some commercial fonts I have and more important, to take advantage of some opentype features.